Thomas Rice, PhD, is an affiliate at the UCLA Center for Health Policy Research and a distinguished research professor in the Department of Health Policy and Management at the UCLA Fielding School of Public Health.

Rice previously served as a faculty at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. He served the UCLA campus as Vice Chancellor for Academic Personnel from 2006 to 2011. He also served as editor of the journal Medical Care Research and Review from 1994 to 2000 and is an elected member of the National Academy of Medicine (previously Institute of Medicine).

Rice is a health economist and his areas of interest include national health care systems, competition and regulation, behavioral economics, physicians’ economic behavior, health insurance, and the Medicare program. He has authored several books, including Health Insurance Systems: An International Comparison, published in 2021. The fifth edition of his book, The Economics of Health Reconsidered, was published in 2023. The second edition of his book: United States of America: Health Systems Review, was published in 2020.

Rice received his PhD in economics at the University of California at Berkeley.

Discover, Connect:

Explore

Health Insurance Systems, An International Comparison
External Publication
External Publication

Health Insurance Systems, An International Comparison

This publication offers united and synthesized information currently available only in scattered locations — if at all — to students, researchers, and policymakers. The book provides helpful contexts, so people worldwide can understand various health care systems. By using it as a guide to the mechanics of different health care systems, readers can examine existing systems as frameworks for developing their own. Case examples of countries adopting insurance characteristics from other countries enhance the critical insights offered in the book. If more information about health insurance alternatives can lead to better decisions, this guide can provide an essential service.

Key Features

  • Delivers fundamental insights into the different ways that countries organize their health insurance systems
  • Presents ten prominent health insurance systems in one book, facilitating comparisons and contrasts, to help draw policy lessons
  • Countries included are Australia, Canada, France, Germany, Japan, the Netherlands, Sweden, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States
  • Helps students, researchers, and policymakers searching for innovative designs by providing cases describing what countries have learned from each other

Read the Publication:

The Affordable Care Act’s Insurance Marketplace Subsidies Were Associated with Reduced Financial Burden for US Adults (Health Affairs)
Journal Article
Journal Article

The Affordable Care Act’s Insurance Marketplace Subsidies Were Associated with Reduced Financial Burden for US Adults (Health Affairs)

Summary: Research suggests that the Affordable Care Act (ACA) Medicaid expansions improved financial protection for the poor. However, evidence is limited on whether subsidies offered through the ACA Marketplaces, the law’s other major coverage expansion, were associated with reduced financial burden. Using national survey data from the period 2008–2017, authors examined changes in household health care spending among low-income adults eligible for both Marketplace premium subsidies and cost-sharing reductions (139%–250% of the federal poverty level) and middle-income adults eligible only for premium subsidies (251%–400% of the federal poverty level), using high-income adults ineligible for subsidies (greater than 400% of the federal poverty level) as controls. 

Findings: Among low-income adults, Marketplace subsidy implementation was associated with 17% lower out-of-pocket spending and 30% lower probability of catastrophic health expenditures. In contrast, middle-income adults did not experience reduced financial burden by either measure. These findings highlight the successes and limitations of Marketplace subsidies as debate continues over the ACA’s future.

Read the Publication:

 

California’s New Gold Rush: Marketplace Enrollees Switch To Gold-Tier Plans In Response To Insurance Premium Changes (Health Affairs)
Journal Article
Journal Article

California’s New Gold Rush: Marketplace Enrollees Switch To Gold-Tier Plans In Response To Insurance Premium Changes (Health Affairs)

​The individual health insurance market has grown significantly since the 2014 implementation of the Affordable Care Act’s state-based and federally facilitated Marketplaces. During annual open enrollment periods, Marketplace enrollees can switch plans for the upcoming year. The percentage of re-enrollees in California’s state-based Marketplace, Covered California, who made changes to their coverage steadily increased between the 2014–15 and 2017–18 open enrollment periods. Following the implementation of “silver loading”— in which insurers raised 2018 silver-tier plan premiums to compensate for their loss of federal payments for cost-sharing reductions — the proportion of consumers who moved into gold plans during the 2017–18 open enrollment period dramatically increased, compared to previous years. Among bronze or silver plan enrollees who switched metal tiers during open enrollment, those who could enroll in gold plans that were no more than $49 per month more expensive than their initial bronze or silver plan had a significantly higher probability of switching to gold coverage than those who faced larger premium differences.

 



Publication Authors:
 

  • Petra Rasmussen, MPH
  • Thomas Rice, PhD
  • Gerald F. Kominski, Ph.D.
Ambulance Diversions Following Public Hospital Emergency Department
Journal Article
Journal Article

Ambulance Diversions Following Public Hospital Emergency Department

​This study aimed to examine whether hospitals are more likely to temporarily close their emergency departments (EDs) to ambulances (through ambulance diversions) if neighboring diverting hospitals are public vs. private. Authors analyzed ambulance diversion logs for California hospitals, discharge data, and hospital characteristics data from California's Office of Statewide Health Planning and Development and the American Hospital Association (2007).

They match public and private (nonprofit or for-profit) hospitals by distance and size and use random-effects models examining diversion probability and timing of private hospitals following diversions by neighboring public vs matched private hospitals.   Hospitals are 3.6 percent more likely to declare diversions if neighboring diverting hospitals are public vs private. Hospitals declaring diversions have lower ED occupancy after neighboring public hospitals divert. Hospitals have 4.2 percent shorter diversions if neighboring diverting hospitals are public vs private. When the neighboring hospital ends its diversion first, hospitals terminate diversions 4.2 percent sooner if the neighboring hospital is public vs private.   Authors conclude that sample hospitals respond differently to diversions by neighboring public (vs private) hospitals, suggesting that these hospitals might be strategically declaring ambulance diversions to avoid treating low-paying patients served by public hospitals.


Publication Authors:
  • Charleen Hsuan, JD, PhD
  • Ninez A. Ponce, PhD, MPP
  • Thomas Rice, PhD
  • Jack Needleman, PhD, FAAN
  • et al
Health Insurance Systems, An International Comparison
External Publication
External Publication

Health Insurance Systems, An International Comparison

This publication offers united and synthesized information currently available only in scattered locations — if at all — to students, researchers, and policymakers. The book provides helpful contexts, so people worldwide can understand various health care systems. By using it as a guide to the mechanics of different health care systems, readers can examine existing systems as frameworks for developing their own. Case examples of countries adopting insurance characteristics from other countries enhance the critical insights offered in the book. If more information about health insurance alternatives can lead to better decisions, this guide can provide an essential service.

Key Features

  • Delivers fundamental insights into the different ways that countries organize their health insurance systems
  • Presents ten prominent health insurance systems in one book, facilitating comparisons and contrasts, to help draw policy lessons
  • Countries included are Australia, Canada, France, Germany, Japan, the Netherlands, Sweden, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States
  • Helps students, researchers, and policymakers searching for innovative designs by providing cases describing what countries have learned from each other

Read the Publication:

View All Publications

The Affordable Care Act’s Insurance Marketplace Subsidies Were Associated with Reduced Financial Burden for US Adults (Health Affairs)
Journal Article
Journal Article

The Affordable Care Act’s Insurance Marketplace Subsidies Were Associated with Reduced Financial Burden for US Adults (Health Affairs)

Summary: Research suggests that the Affordable Care Act (ACA) Medicaid expansions improved financial protection for the poor. However, evidence is limited on whether subsidies offered through the ACA Marketplaces, the law’s other major coverage expansion, were associated with reduced financial burden. Using national survey data from the period 2008–2017, authors examined changes in household health care spending among low-income adults eligible for both Marketplace premium subsidies and cost-sharing reductions (139%–250% of the federal poverty level) and middle-income adults eligible only for premium subsidies (251%–400% of the federal poverty level), using high-income adults ineligible for subsidies (greater than 400% of the federal poverty level) as controls. 

Findings: Among low-income adults, Marketplace subsidy implementation was associated with 17% lower out-of-pocket spending and 30% lower probability of catastrophic health expenditures. In contrast, middle-income adults did not experience reduced financial burden by either measure. These findings highlight the successes and limitations of Marketplace subsidies as debate continues over the ACA’s future.

Read the Publication:

 

California’s New Gold Rush: Marketplace Enrollees Switch To Gold-Tier Plans In Response To Insurance Premium Changes (Health Affairs)
Journal Article
Journal Article

California’s New Gold Rush: Marketplace Enrollees Switch To Gold-Tier Plans In Response To Insurance Premium Changes (Health Affairs)

​The individual health insurance market has grown significantly since the 2014 implementation of the Affordable Care Act’s state-based and federally facilitated Marketplaces. During annual open enrollment periods, Marketplace enrollees can switch plans for the upcoming year. The percentage of re-enrollees in California’s state-based Marketplace, Covered California, who made changes to their coverage steadily increased between the 2014–15 and 2017–18 open enrollment periods. Following the implementation of “silver loading”— in which insurers raised 2018 silver-tier plan premiums to compensate for their loss of federal payments for cost-sharing reductions — the proportion of consumers who moved into gold plans during the 2017–18 open enrollment period dramatically increased, compared to previous years. Among bronze or silver plan enrollees who switched metal tiers during open enrollment, those who could enroll in gold plans that were no more than $49 per month more expensive than their initial bronze or silver plan had a significantly higher probability of switching to gold coverage than those who faced larger premium differences.

 



Publication Authors:
 

  • Petra Rasmussen, MPH
  • Thomas Rice, PhD
  • Gerald F. Kominski, Ph.D.
Center in the News

4 Undeniable Signs the US Health Care System Is Broken

Americans spend more on health care than any other people — about one-sixth of our nation’s GDP. According to Thomas Rice, Ph.D., at UCLA’s Fielding School of Public Health, our health care expenses are double that of other wealthy nations, like Germany, Japan and the U.K.

“We spend over $4 trillion in the United States each year on health care. It's a large chunk of the entire world spending on health care, around 40%. But if you look at it per person, we spend about $12,500 per person per year on health care,"" he told NBCLX.

News https://www.lx.com/politics/4-undeniable-signs-the-us-health-care-system-is-broken/49887/
Center in the News

Medicare Direct Contracting Demo Garners Critics and Defenders

But the relationship of other countries to fee-for-service medicine is somewhat complicated, according to Thomas Rice, PhD, professor of health policy and management at the University of California Los Angeles Fielding School of Public Health.

News https://www.medpagetoday.com/practicemanagement/reimbursement/96497

View all In the News

Online & In-Person

ACA Repeal and Replace: What's the Latest?

View all Events